It’s a short newsletter today, folks, because I have a very quick — but important — point to make.
It stems from this Politico story:
The White House has been quietly urging lawmakers in both parties to sell the war efforts abroad as a potential economic boom at home.
Aides have been distributing talking points to Democrats and Republicans who have been supportive of continued efforts to fund Ukraine’s resistance to make the case that doing so is good for American jobs, according to five White House aides and lawmakers familiar with the effort and granted anonymity to speak freely.
The push, first previewed publicly in President Joe Biden’s Oval Office address last week, comes ahead of the election of a new House speaker, with the White House trying to invoke patriotism to help convince holdout Republicans not just to help Kyiv but to pass a major package that includes funds for Israel as well.
This is incredibly cynical.
The war in Ukraine is not a jobs program. It’s not an economic stimulus. It’s a war. People are dying, horribly.
My own instincts in matters of war and peace lean toward peace, as you probably know. But I’ve still been inclined to be — cautiously — supportive of Ukraine’s defense, because the Ukrainians are on defense. They did not ask for the war.
But a lot of Americans are apparently ready to move on.
I’m not going to wade into that fight today. There’s a lot that goes into the decision of how and whether to continue aiding Ukraine — assessments of the aftermath, the issue of not-infinite U.S. resources, balancing aid there to what Americans leaders hope to do for Israel and in the Pacific.
I won’t pretend the issue is simple.
The White House is failing to make its case, though. And so it’s turning to an alternative. It’s encouraging Americans to see support of Ukraine as a good for profiteering reasons.
Maybe that will work.
But it makes me less — not more — inclined to support the war effort.
Boy howdy. I fear the MAGA House will stall aid to Ukraine, which may prolong the war (or worse ...), but military contractors and their employees will be fine no matter what happens. This sounds like the justifications the McNamara types gave for expanding the Vietnam War.
I support whatever story they have to spin to get Ukraine its help. Pure ideology in messaging is just a ridiculous request.
It is also true. The vast majority of arms we've sent are old and needed replacement, upgrade, or scrapping due to age or obsolescence. The M113s and HMMWVs are great examples, and sending them to Ukraine saved the USA money cause that was less expensive than scrapping them, and both those vehicles have saved lives. The M113s have been notably successful battlefield ambulances. Bradleys are still combat relevant, but the search for replacement is well advanced. Any munitions we send create an empty spot on the shelf that needs replenishment, and our gross expansion of artillery shell manufacturing capability is a direct jobs creator involving billions of dollars and many jobs. All those expendables, missiles, ammunition, clothing, medical supplies, all need replacing.
There is a reason a large chunk of Ukrainian aid money never leaves the USA.